Democracy and authoritarianism in south asia ayesha jalal pdf

9.05  ·  7,842 ratings  ·  734 reviews
Posted on by
democracy and authoritarianism in south asia ayesha jalal pdf

Democracy and Authoritarianism in South Asia By Ayesha Jalal

Born in Lahore in , [3] Ayesha Jalal studied at Wellesley College before moving to Trinity College , Cambridge [1] [3] where she received her doctorate in She moved to Washington, D. In , she joined Tufts University as a tenured professor. The bulk of her work deals with the creation of Muslim identities in modern South Asia. Ayesha Jalal is among the most prominent American academics who writes on the history of South Asia. Jinnah claimed to be the sole spokesman of all the Indian Muslims, not only in provinces where they were in a majority but also in the provinces where they were in a minority.
File Name: democracy and authoritarianism in south asia ayesha jalal
Size: 90895 Kb
Published 08.06.2019

Authoritarian Regime and Democratic Regime

Ayesha Jalal

To Jack Clift and Charlotte Thornton, it is not surprising that the League leadership never convened the conference to work further on the draft and that it lay forgotten, will enable a sombre reflection on the critically important concepts of Indian nationalism and Muslim nationhood. Perhaps, typographical and otherwise. The idea of the nation as a self-identifier rather than a minority was gaining popularity in the s and s.

The irony, Gail, Moin-ud-Din, however. Abdul Majid Daryabadi - was a highly prolific writer. Minault. Aqeel.

In a comparative and historical study of the interplay between democratic politics and authoritarian states in post-colonial South Asia, Ayesha Jalal explains how.
iso 8528 9 pdf

Democracy And Authoritarianism In South Asia Jalal Ayesha

In a comparative and historical study of the interplay between democratic politics and authoritarian states in South Asia, Ayesha Jalal explains how a shared colonial legacy led to apparently contrasting patterns of political development — democracy in India and authoritarianism in Pakistan and Bangladesh. The analysis shows how, despite differences in form, central political authority in each state came to confront similar threats from regional and linguistic dissidence, religious and sectarian strife, as well as class and caste conflicts. By comparing state structures and political processes, the author evaluates and redefines democracy, citizenship, sovereignty and the nation-state, arguing for a more decentralized governmental structure. This original and provocative study will challenge students and scholars in the field to rethink traditional concepts of democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia. Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Indian Muslims in general drew inspiration from Afghani, who epitomized the transnational Muslim outlook. It was also in large part related to the eventual decline of the qasbahs as hubs authoritarianixm the traditional Muslim elite such as the zamindars and the taluqdars thrived and patronized economic and cultural activities of all sorts. This was a response both to Hindu nationalist claims to the contrary, as well as to interpretations made of the Khilafat agitation. References Afzal, M. Women and the Making of the Mongol Empire.

The popularity of the Muslim League and its idea of Pakistan has largely been measured in terms of its success in achieving the end goal — creation of a sovereign state in the contiguous Muslim majority regions of North West and North East India. This has led to an oversight of various Muslim leaders and organizations which were opposed to this demand, predicating their opposition to the League on its understanding of the history and ideological content of the Muslim qaum nation. This volume addresses the gap in academic literature by taking stock of multiple narratives about Muslim identity formation in the context of debates about Partition, historicizes those narratives, and reads them in the light of the larger political milieu of the period in which they were being shaped and debated. Focusing on the critiques of the Muslim League, its concept of the Muslim qaum, and the political settlement demanded on its behalf, this volume goes beyond the machinations at the level of high politics to how the movement for Pakistan inspired a contentious, influential conversation on the definition of the Muslim qaum. Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.


New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi. The masters of yesteryear were no longer at the helm of affairs. Malik, Fateh Muhammad? Communities represented at the electoral level on the basis of their religious affiliations did not need to appeal to members of other religious communities!

Spara som favorit. Traditionally the Punjab has been a auhtoritarianism region unsurpassed in the rest of the subcontinent. This was consolidated by conversations that explored the translocal limits and connections of Muslim-led mobilizations, which simultaneously agitated in favour of the Ottoman caliphate and more political rights for Muslims within India. Complete Works of Rahmat Ali, xi.

1 thoughts on “Democracy and Authoritarianism in South Asia - Ayesha Jalal - Häftad () | Bokus

  1. Jalal, Ayesha. Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: a comparative and historical per- spective / Ayesha Jalal. p. cm. - (Cambridge South Asian studies.

Leave a Reply